Design Edge Canada Website of the Year - Canadian Business Press
News
15 March 2010
Switch Design Lab rebrands as Archerfish
TORONTO—Local agency Archerfish has recently rebranded and renamed its design agency. Archerfish partner and creative director Jennifer Mercer says talk of rebranding the company from Switch Design Lab started last spring, in the midst of the first recession the company has encountered.

Archerfish (top) is the new name for Switch Design Lab
 
Archerfish (top) is the new name for Switch Design Lab
 


“We are a fairly young company,” says Mercer. “We started in 2003, so we missed the recession in 2002. Last year came as a bit of a shock to us, the fragility of the economy caused us to do some soul searching.” The company conducted anonymous interviews with its clients and found the brand was sending out mixed messages. “A lot of clients felt that we were perhaps too limited,” she says. “Other clients felt like we were more marketing based than design. It was obvious through the interview process that we needed to do a complete overhaul of the brand.”

The name Archerfish was chosen to represent the differences between the partners in the company, Mercer and Bobby Murbah. “Bobby is more of the designer and I work as the writer and art director,” says Mercer. “People think it is funny that a writer and designer can work together without killing each other. But it works and we can offer well-rounded creative because we are constantly working together.”

Archer represents Murbah, who can see the end goal from the first concept meeting, says Mercer, who is represented by the fish, delving deeper into the process before arriving at an end result. “The logo focuses on a simple typographic treatment,” she says. “The clean typeface also contains a clever symbol between the F and the I which suggests both the archers aim and the healthy, creative appetite of the fish.”

Mercer says Switch Design Lab’s logo was a bit more linear than the work they wanted to create. “The new brand represents [our] creativity a little more,” she says. Contact: Archerfishstudio.com


— Val Maloney
1. Anthony
15 March 2010 at 10:34 PM
All the best to Bobby and Jennifer in their new endeavour.

Best of luck.
2. Anonymous
16 March 2010 at 12:08 AM
Archerfish? huh?
don't switch your day job
oh, that is your day job
3. Anonymous
16 March 2010 at 12:40 AM
which is the before and which is the after
both are bad
4. Anonymous
16 March 2010 at 12:18 PM
I must say, I love the new look. The name Archerfish, my gosh it's brilliant. Love the meaning behind it.
5. Anonymous
17 March 2010 at 10:18 AM
Congratulations to Jennifer and Bobby!
I wish you all the success in the world.
6. Cynthia
17 March 2010 at 1:13 PM
I'm really liking this rebrand! Like the old logo too, though the new one is clean and clever, will definitely keep Archerfish in mind for future work.
7. Tina
17 March 2010 at 6:47 PM
What a great choice for a new name! So unique and such great insight into the name. I've worked with a lot of firms and these guys are rising stars in the industry. They are on my radar for new projects.
8. Kevin G.
20 March 2010 at 3:30 PM
when I see hack work like this ... and people actually claiming it is "brilliant", I realize why anyone can claim they are a designer these days.

those of you that think "Archerfish" is a great name and hacking the "f" makes it a great logo, do not know what professional design or typography is about.
9. Rebecca
22 March 2010 at 3:15 PM
I don't understand the hate for this logo. Great feedback Kevin. If you're going to criticize, how about providing constructive criticism or do you not know what that is? I've worked with top design and ad agencies and I'll say that the name reveals a subtle twist to the firm's identity, and I agree with Tina, these guys are definitely on the rise and are most definitely on my radar.
10. Adam
23 March 2010 at 4:43 AM
I like this logo and the meaning behind the name. Good luck to Jennifer and Bobby with the re-brand.
11. Linsay R.
23 March 2010 at 11:31 PM
as Kevin said, you do not know what professional design or typography is about - not hate - just taste

constructive? try doing more than cutting a piece of an "F" off (no pun) and calling it a logo
12. Anonymous
24 March 2010 at 2:47 PM
I wouldn't say this is a bad logo. I would love to see Linsay and Kevin's portfolios. Often times the people who make these types of comments are hack designers that think they are good. If Kevin or Linsay get this message, please respond with some logos that you have personally done.

Sometimes making small adjustments to the type in a logo is more than enough to make an impact and a long lasting impression (FedEx, IBM, etc).

I would often remind my students that "less is more".
13. Dennis L.
24 March 2010 at 3:56 PM
What? you are comparing brilliant logos like Fedex and IBM to Archerfish? What highschool do you teach at?

Less is more only if it is crafted to be that way. Whoever designed this wannabe logo didn't do it for the love of simplicity, but laziness.

It is such a waste of time that people are even discussing such amateur work. Even if the logo was professional, the name is so bad, it wouldn't make a difference.
Let's move on, people.
14. Anonymous
24 March 2010 at 4:39 PM
I didn't say it was as good as those two logos or even close...I said their logo wasn't as bad as Kevin and Linsay are making it seem...what I was saying is that a logo doesn't have to be complex to be good. Kevin and Linsay were hinting at that...and that is just poor design.
15. Anonymous
25 March 2010 at 11:38 AM
All you so-called design experts criticizing this logo should look at what the logo is for. It's a graphic design studio, not a product or a retail outlet. Having worked and owned and worked in award-winning studios, I feel this logo is great... its simple and to the point. If you look at other design studios around the world, the best ones have timeless identities that are bare-bone simple. This is one is exactly just that. As a graphic design firm, you don't want to a fancy complicated identity cause as designers we always want to change and having something simple and understated is always a better idea. It give you more flexibility in your brand down the line. People are very quick to criticize but they don't take a moment to think a realize what the logo is for and what the purpose of it is. As far as you people criticizing the name... I think its a wonderful unique name. People often don't like unique in our industry... they are always comfortable with whats been done. Great work for Archerfish. Keep it up!
16. Ren
7 April 2010 at 9:17 PM
"Great work for Archerfish. Keep it up!" -- sounds like you work there -- if you think that is great work, you probably should
17. N'geri
13 April 2010 at 3:14 PM
Whether you like the logo or not, I guess Archerfish have certainly got people talking. It seems that this is still one of the "most read" stories on this site, so it's clear whether good or bad, people are definitely paying attention to this firm. I agree with a few of the comments above, first that those who don't like the logo or want to criticize should provide constructive criticism that would help the designers improve their work. And second, those who make the kinds of comments Kevin, Ren and Lindsay have are often hack designers themselves who think their own work is brilliant. Personally, I think the name is unique and different and I like the simplicity of the logo.
18. Marc
14 April 2010 at 1:04 AM
Like art, Design is subjective...This debate can go on for ages but it will basically be a battle of those who like it and those who don't. Interesting comments nonetheless. I myself think the name is intriguing but the wordmark doesn't quite do it for me.
19. Switch Back
16 April 2010 at 12:37 AM
Design is subjective, but not much design or thought went into this logo

The name is a tongue-twister ...try saying it quickly and you will see that it fails a very simple professional naming test ...switch is actually stronger for pronunciation/recall
20. Maria
18 April 2010 at 9:34 PM
My comments echo exactly what number 15 said. It's a logo for a design firm... you don't have to be working for Archerfish to know that... and if you do look at the best firms, their logos are simple and timeless. There is no need for it to be a flashy logo. Less is more... Great work :-)
21. Anonymous
23 April 2010 at 11:57 AM
Maria, I agree less is more, but this logo is only less, not more. I could just set the name in Times Roman and argue that. The logo is not finessed enough to claim that it was designed to be simple. This is not great work.

Name:
Anonymous
Your Name Please!

Comment:
Editor's note: We reserve the right to edit and/or delete comments that we consider inappropriate, defamatory or malicious. Keep your comments constructive.
Comment Copy Please!

Click to refresh
Please fill in the 4-character Captcha!
Archives
Most Recent Comment
Anonymous says:
I wonder if the photo layout is supposed to be a clever attempt at illustrating how they're so super...
Fontest
 
 
Calling all typophiles! Enter our font contest and you could win a prize
FREE Subscription

January/February 2012

FREE Newsletter

Sign up now for our free news and jobs email bulletin

Live from Twitter